Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
What blog is this?
If you seek a Lutheran natalist echo chamber, circumspice.
blogrolls confuse us. don't be offended when we mess up.
=====
=====
=====
CSPP Cooks
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(171)
-
▼
October
(13)
- Where did they come from? Where did they go?
- Great news for Anonymous and the creep in Gauntlet...
- To the person who donated these pjs to the CSL Res...
- Is there a happier sound in the world
- Open letter
- Internet doula
- Have you had
- Better safe than sorry.
- If Scrooge had been in prodromal labor instead of ...
- Word to the unwise
- I'm waiting to be impressed
- Childbirth Orthodoxy Translation
- Crazy, conjugated
-
▼
October
(13)
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 Concordian Sisters of Perpetual Parturition. Text, original photographs, and content may not be used without the express written permission of and/or attribution to the respective author at concordiansisters.blogspot.com.
We encourage you to share excerpts of our work on your own blog or website, but we request that you link back to concordiansisters.blogspot.com. Please do not copy and paste or publish full posts in any venue without express written permission from the respective author. Permission may be requested via email.
We encourage you to share excerpts of our work on your own blog or website, but we request that you link back to concordiansisters.blogspot.com. Please do not copy and paste or publish full posts in any venue without express written permission from the respective author. Permission may be requested via email.
Labels
Baptism
Books
Chickness
Childbirth
Confession
Contraception
Dealing With It
Defessa
Diaper experiment
Don't be an idiot
Dudes
Etiquette
Fashion
Gravida
Homeschooling
Huswifery
Kinder
Kirche
Korset
Kuche
Lactans
Marital bliss
Maternal Bliss
Metamothers
Miscarriage
Names
NFP
Not homeschooling
Our Beloved Synod
Pastoral wifery
Perpetual Parturition
personal piety
Poems
Postpartum
Repentance
Smartness
Soundtrack
Urth
Usage
Vanity
9 comments:
"Mothers no longer need to have 5 or 6 children to ensure the next generation."
What sad words- and what a sad assumption, that women only had children to ensure the next generation.
Reading this article makes me want to have fifteen more children.
You know, all the noble women could pop the consumption bubble, too, if they would but submit once again to being consumed themselves.
HAHAHAHAHA.
"Two or three is enough, and that is what they are choosing to have."
I am so sick of this "choosing" language. Someone, please, point out to people--including my MIL--that many, many women who would "choose" children a hundred times over suffer from barrenness instead. How does life become so, well, a product of our shopping-aisle times? This brings to mind a terrible, terrible commercial I saw a few years ago for a type of birth control--women were "shopping" for a dream house, travel icons like the Eiffel Tower, etc. and skipping over the stork. It was disgusting.
Oooh, I remember that one. What a terrible image, indeed.
Emommy-
Here's an old one about choosing.
http://lutheransandcontraception.blogspot.com/2010/06/are-you-done.html
Just read an excellent article in the WSJ from Saturday about how this whole "overpopulation of Earth" thing is a big myth. If I may be so crass, I never worry about overpopulation anyway, because I live in North Dakota.
Elizabeth: I once had to debate (NPDA) someone who wished to take Swift's modest proposal literally: eat children, and thereby prevent overpopulation. To win that debate, I had only to laugh at my opponent while pointing out the window at the vast Nebraska prairie. If only real life were so easy. And fun. :D
HA HA HA I forgot about that. And the rest of us were stuck with that boring old DoE case.
Post a Comment