I'd apologize to the purists, but really, when is a girl supposed to find time to mix her own?
22 July 2012
I think this will be my new standard reply
whenever someone watches me wrangling kids and remarks, "I don't know how you do it":
20 July 2012
Indelicate but true
Some of the best postpartum advice I've ever gotten was from the nurse who walked in shortly after Baby2 was born and handed me some Colace: "Don't try to be a hero. Just take this for the next few days."
Some of those baby nurses really know what's what. Anyone else want to share any memorable postpartum advice from an experienced baby nurse, midwife, or mentor-mom? (Or from hard-won experience?)
Some of those baby nurses really know what's what. Anyone else want to share any memorable postpartum advice from an experienced baby nurse, midwife, or mentor-mom? (Or from hard-won experience?)
15 July 2012
Hey! I can tie my shoes again!
The strife is o’er, the battle done…
Dear observant Cathy: Yes! I beat
the ticker!
Dear praying Anon: Thank you, thank
you, and your prayers were answered just about 11 hours after the 13th!
Praising God for another healthy,
freakishly adorable, 7 lb 11 oz baby boy.
Random thought: Whenever I
contemplate a newbie, I am astonished by his astonishing smallness. Until I
recall where he so recently dwelt, and his method of egress. And then I am
astonished by his astonishing largeness.
11 July 2012
It's not OK, but that's OK
I’ve felt very loose-endish lately.
Waiting on a baby, especially when your last baby was early and you’re already
in that territory, can do that to a body. Anyway. I insomniacally picked up a
book from a pile that had recently arrived at our address (you all know about
AbeBooks, right?), muttering to my longsuffering husband about the appropriateness
of its subtitle: “Weary? Can’t get it right? Struggling to make life work?” Now
that I’m all of 30some pages into Larry Crabb’s The Pressure’s Off, I’m not exactly positioned to write a review or
a recommendation, but those introductory pages did help with the muttering a bit
;O.
(Aside: Crabb has a penchant for
Capitalized Phrases, but I find myself mostly willing to construe it as
idiosyncratic rather than annoying.)
Here’s how Crabb defines the main
problem he’s addressing in this book:
Most evangelicals properly reject
the teachings commonly known as the prosperity gospel or the health-and-wealth
gospel….But sometimes we smuggle our own version of that idea into our
understanding of the Christian life. Though we deplore the idea that health and
wealth are available on demand, we like the idea that legitimate blessings are
given to those who meet the requirements. The Bible says so….(Deut. 29:9)…We
want the good life. We may define it more spiritually…..But we still maintain
that the good life of legitimate blessings is a worthy goal and one that may be
reached by living a faithful life of obedience to biblical principles.
Crabb refers to this more subtle sinkhole
as the Law of Linearity (if I do A, then B will follow). We find ourselves
trying to follow Biblical principles in order to obtain the Better Life of
Blessings, when what we really should be pursuing is the New and Living Way,
the Better Hope (Hebrews 7:18-19) of intimacy with God no matter our life’s
circumstances. (You see what I mean about the Capitalized Phrases.)
This Law of Linearity thing is a potentially
ruinous guilt trap for Christian parents, who are well drilled in the Biblical proverbials
of parenting (train up a child in the way he should go, and all that). One of
the most simultaneously frustrating and freeing realizations about parenting is
that beyond a certain point (which varies with each child’s personality and
age), we have little to no control over
our children’s actions, particularly in public. This becomes exponentially
more true with each additional child, and with, shall we say, certain children.
Because you can only get so far with a whistle.
How quickly I fall into the
despairing cycle: It’s not working. Why can’t
I get everything, or even anything, going in the right direction? What am I
doing wrong? It’s! Not! Working! I have wasted too many moments
second-guessing. But…after all, if I’m
doing A like the Christian parenting books say, then shouldn’t B be happening,
at least some of the time?
No. B does not necessarily follow
even the most diligent A-ing. There is some value in (some) parenting books. Appropriate
A-ing should be pursued. But! When B does not follow, the cry of a mother’s
heart should not be (or should not primarily be) for the Better Life: “Why,
Lord? What am I doing wrong? Show me how to make it work!” Plead rather for the
Better Hope: “Please, Lord. With this gift of your very life’s blood, pour into
me the strength to continue pouring myself out. Enlarge my heart, that the
life-giving transfusion may not be wasted through selfishly narrowed arteries. Teach
me to live daily the difference of that cleansing flood, the difference between
hard and hopeless, invisible to all but the eyes of faith. God grant me eyes of
faith!”
Things might not seem to be working
right now. Truly, why would we expect them to?
And where better to learn to desire the Giver above the gifts, than in the
place where the gifts are stripped away? And in the time when crutches are knocked out, replaced with cross?
Create in me a
clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me.
Cast me not away
from thy presence; and take not thy holy spirit from me.
Restore unto me
the joy of thy salvation; and uphold me with thy free spirit.
Old wounds
Remember when it got really obvious that Bob Sagat hated hosting America's Funniest Home Videos? That was so sad.
09 July 2012
This magic moment
One of those threats that gets made about not staying home with kids (for those who have the luxury of making that decision) is about all the magical moments that end up being given over to someone else. The hired hands of the world are getting the first smiles and first steps while the mothers are doing exactly what I do all day except that they do it for strangers.
But the magic argument would not convince me. I'm not a person to get terribly excited about milestones or moments. What I find much more compelling is the grunt work argument. Although I wouldn't be thrilled about the joy of my baby's first smile falling to a hired hand (to whatever extent that might bring joy to a hired hand), I like much less the idea that someone else is doing the filthy work my own choices have generated. I think that the least pleasant tasks which are included in the care of children are most particularly and appropriately mine. It weirds me out to imagine some other person rummaging around in my children's diapers and underwear all day. It's not that I think everyone else in the world is a pervert, it's just that diaper rummaging is really personal and really gross. Is it possible to pay someone enough for changing a dirty diaper? I don't think so. If some fair price could be put on it, I'm sure it wouldn't begin to fit my budget.
Whether it is a good and generous heart or a needy mercenary who is willing to take on these endless, icky, and ungratifying tasks, that willingness does not negate my responsibility. If my kid pukes on someone, I think it should be on me. If my kid's nose is runny, I think I should wipe it. If my kid is spreading a rash, I think I should itch. I'll likely get some magic thrown in too, but that is a gracious benefit. The gross stuff is what I really owe it to the world to do myself, because no one else should have to.
Just give it to anyone! Absolutely anyone!
Labels:
Huswifery,
Maternal Bliss
03 July 2012
Hey, I'm an American
A recurring theme in this blog, or
maybe just in my head: the many and various ways that motherhood, particularly
the seemingly perpetual motherhood of young children, is so very, wrenchingly,
good for the soul. Our American*-steeped psyches, being as they’re also sin-sick,
get to thinking that those individual rights we treasure so dearly apply
universally and in family life. We do so love our rights.
And I am as slow and as sin-steeped
as they come. For me, at least, it took the continual demands of motherhood to
understand that looking not only to my own interests, but also to the interestsof others, might mean doing so on a schedule other than my own—not just
sometimes, but every day. Or that counting
others as more significant than myself might require actual (gasp!) sacrifice!
And that those others might be diaper-clad, with an astonishing amount of
tyranny packed into a ridiculous stature, relentless, and thankless.
As Rebekah pointed out awhile back,
there’s nothing like motherhood to make a body realize that even introversion,
for instance, is a privilege, not a right.
I was just thinking of a few other privileges
that I formerly assumed to be in the category of unalienable rights, e.g.:
The right to determine how a day
should start. I love a peaceful morning; a new beginning; an orderly
commencement of the day’s tasks. Realizing that I had to awaken with, and
likely immediately feed, whichever little ‘un(s) woke at whatsoever time, was
an adjustment. I got kind of used to that. I harbored no illusions about, for
instance, my chances of meditating over a devotional book with an uninterrupted
cup of tea to the sweet chorus of morning birds. And yet I used to think that I
was at least entitled to some semblance of order in the waking and breakfast
process—especially if I worked hard enough to earn a little law and order in
the way things went down. As it turns out, I have a kid who wakes up like he’s
been shot from a cannon into britches full of fire ants. And his morning just
won’t feel complete till he’s dragged his siblings through the anthill too. So.
Farewell to my “right” to order the day’s beginning and the breakfast table as
I please. (Heck, I can’t even get them all to EAT the same thing for breakfast…)
What, your breakfast table doesn't look like this either? (Kids obviously sold separately too...)
Also: the right to three
uninterrupted minutes to deal with necessary matters of personal health and
hygiene. No need to elaborate here, eh?
Suffice to say that the battle I
must wage against my desire to have my rights is a daily one, and the list
could go on and on. And on. But I will end it here with a small pang in my
heart and a tiny wistful sigh, as I remember the days in which it seemed to me
that the opportunity to enjoy a piece of chocolate at whatsoever moment it
pleased me was indeed as unalienable a right as if it had been John Hancocked
all those 236 years ago.
Awkward
Explaining to someone, "I don't like your friend because she's so uncharitable." :P
Labels:
personal piety,
Repentance
01 July 2012
Peter and Joan
They were the happiest couple in that country, because
they always understood each other, and that was because
they always meant the same thing, and that was because
they always loved what was fair and true and right better,
not than anything else,
but than everything else put together.
George MacDonald, The Princess and Curdie
Labels:
Marital bliss,
Smartness
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)